Listening To Music And Composing Essay Example for Free

Listening To Music And Composing Essay Listening to music and composing my own digital music is my favorite extra-curricular activity. Music makes me feel refreshed and even after a hectic day at work, five minutes of good music helps me relax my nerves instantly. The routine lifestyle rarely leaves much time for my extra-curricular activity. However, I always make sure to maintain a rich music library on my laptop as well as handheld devices so that I can listen to it whenever I feel. Moreover, I am also into composing music. I am a vocalist, I play the piano and I have a digital mixing console also. My room is a mini studio where I can record my own music. Composing new music or mixing up tracks requires utmost creativity and imagination. In a month, I make sure to publish three mixes after recording and digital reworking. When music is your extracurricular activity, the best part about it is that you can enjoy it indoors. Whatever the weather and climate outside, you can always be comfortable and enjoy it in your room. If you have a dolby surround system in your home, it would serve as the best way to listen to music. Playing a musical instrument is a bliss in itself. Whenever I play the piano, I feel connected to the nature and its energies. That is when your creativity blossoms and you can use your imagination to the fullest in composing new tunes. The best way to enjoy music is to relax on a couch or the bed with the earphones plugged in your ears and listening to it with closed eyes. You can then feel each instrument as it plays. Some people prefer loud music, but it isn’t always enjoyable. Dance music is ok when it comes to parties but it cannot be enjoyed always and when one is seeking relaxation.

Abortion Essay -- essays research papers

ABORTION Abortion, in my opinion, has been one of the largest debataable issues in American Society. There are so many aspects and views to examine before one can even begin to form their own opinion. In order to discuss an important issue such as abortion, we must first understand what it means. Abortion is the ending of a pregnancy before the fetus has developed and grown enough to live outside the mother. When abortion happens naturally before the 20th week it is called a spontaneous abortion, or miscarriage. If it happens naturally after the 20th week it is termed a late fetal death or a still birth. An abortion caused by a medical procedure is called an induced abortion. Most induced abortion are performed in the first trimester or first 12 weeks after conception.   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  The abortion debate seems like an unresolable conflict of rights. The right of women to control their own bodies, and the right of children to be born. In the United States abortion became legal in 1973. Recently, courts have upheld the right of a woman to have an abortion, and as a result, has caused many heated debates. The opposing abortion groups are refered to as â€Å"pro-life† and â€Å"pro-choise.† The people who refer to themselves as pro-choise belive the woman has the right to choose for herself whether to have an abortion. It has nothing to do with the humanity of the fetus but is entirely about the womans freedom. They say every persoon has the right to live and move in freedom. A pregnant woman and her unborn child are one and the law should protect the woman’s right. They most often refer to the embryo as nothing â€Å"a blob.† Saying that the fetus is not alive because it can not live outside the womans womb. Furthermore they gone as far as saying the world is already over-populated. They claim abortion is a personal choice. Therefore an abortion is justified if the mother wants an abortion. Whereas pro-life people belive that destroying a human life is morally wrong and should be restricted. Their belive that the loss of one’s life is one of the greatest losses one can suffer. The loss of one’s life deprives one of all the experiences, activ ities, and enjoyments that would otherwise have constituted one’s future. In their eyes abortion is a sin. They claim that human lives are being taken at a rate of 1.5 million a year for convenience. Is abortion right or... ...he already has all the children she wants. Also she could be very young and her parents do not want her to have the baby. Abortions under these circumstances are similar because it’s the deliberate taking of a life just for convenience.. I belive a pregnant woman should seek counseling and advice before making a decision to have an abortion. Counseling early in the pregnancy is important for a positive outcome regardless of whether the pregnancy will continue or an abortion is chosen There is other options for instance the baby could be given up for adoption. Besides if you know you have had unpotected sex there is emergency contraception methods available to prevent pregnancy up to 72 hours after the unprotected sex accoured. There are so many birth control methods currently available for there to be any unwanted pregancies. With one exception for pregnancies tresulting from rape or incest. I feel in my heart that a human life should not be sacrificed because it is a gift from God. This is only my opinion. There are alot of arguments regarding abortion. They all provide food for thought. If you want to hear other arguments just bring up the subject at your next family gathering.

Corporation Tech Essay

Corporation Tech will face many security risks with their current network. The user domain is the single most vulnerable part of any network and as such poses the most obvious security risk. To mitigate risks involving the users is to implement policies and training to educate the user on proper use and security best practices. By educating the user on security practices such as secure passwords, safe web surfing, and securing their workstations, many potential attacks can be avoided. Policies and training are also necessary because they can be used as evidence when taking administrative action against a user or intruder in the event the system or data information is compromised. Laptops and workstations have their own set of security risks associated with them. They are vulnerable to being compromised by malware, spyware, or even hackers that take advantage of certain exploits. Laptops, workstations and mobile devices are susceptible to malicious software attacks, theft or loss. Viruses and malware can affect these devices and are usually acquired through contaminated email attachments and hyperlinks that redirect the user to exploited web sites or are transferred through USB storage devices. Viruses and malware can also be acquired by downloading infected files or programs that are designed by hackers. Because of the need to protect systems against threats, all workstations and laptops should be secured with antivirus and firewall software and updated and patched on a regular basis to fix vulnerabilities with the software that hackers may exploit. Since the laptops are mobile by nature they are at risk of being stolen along with all of the data saved on their hard drives. The best security method for this would be to encrypt the hard drives on the laptops and where feasible only store sensitive data on corporate servers and allow authorized user  remote access to the data via SSHVPN sessions. Physical security or lack thereof also poses a huge risk; if an attacker has physical access to your equipment they do not actually need your log in credentials to access data. Attackers could boot your systems up on a live CD and compromise your information without leaving any trace in the logs other than a restart. Even if an attacker has a narrow window for physical access to your systems, they can steal the hardware and gain access to the data from it at their convenience. Secure all removable equipment is locked storage locations with security controls such as cameras and biometric access devices. Distributed Denial of Service (DDOS) attacks are a major concern when it comes to the company’s servers; this is done when a botnet sends an overwhelming amount of requests to the servers until they shut down. The best method to deal with this is to install security hardware or software that can detect these kinds of attacks as they are beginning to take place and filter that traffic out. The hardware is often very effective but also can be very expensive which can be a whole different issue but if you have the funding available I would recommend purchasing the hardware. SQL injections are one of the most common attacks on web based applications, these attacks occur when an attacker inserts a SQL statement that is not authorized through a SQL data channel such as the login screen. This best way to mitigate this risk is to implement string checking for special SQL characters or install software to check the web application for injection vulnerabilities. The software may cost a little money but it will help to prevent unauthorized access to information in your database.

A Horror Of The Boston Massacre - Free Essay Example

Sample details Pages: 5 Words: 1385 Downloads: 9 Date added: 2019/08/16 Category History Essay Level High school Tags: Boston Massacre Essay Did you like this example? On March 5, 1770, British troops fired into a crowd of Bostonians, killing three civilians immediately and injuring eight more. Two of the wounded died from their injuries soon thereafter. This event was quickly dubbed the Boston Massacre by Americans critiquing the British for imposing taxes and stationing troops in the colonies. Don’t waste time! Our writers will create an original "A Horror Of The Boston Massacre" essay for you Create order Historians still have not decided whether this event was truly a massacre, which implies an attack on innocent, unarmed people, or the fatal conclusion to a riot initiated by colonists. Two important primary sources inform these historical debates. One, written by Captain Thomas Preston, offers the commanding British officers perspective on the events of that fateful night. A dramatically different perspective on this event is offered by an anonymous American partisan. While both accounts acknowledge the tragic conclusionfive deathsof the events of March 5th, they disagree strongly on the instigator of the violence. Captain Thomas Preston was the officer in charge of the 29th Regiment on the night of March 5th. His deposition was obtained by the court systems in Boston about a week after the incidents that took place in King Street. Preston had been arrested for his involvement in the massacre, and he remained in jail until late October, 1770, when he was acquitted of all the charges against him (Linder). Therefore, Preston had a clear agenda in his account: establishing a persuasive case for the innocence of both himself and his troops. His deposition served as a legal document intended to support him as the defendant in a criminal trial. While he might have offered an honest account of the event, he definitely stood to gain from describing the events of March 5th as the unfortunate result of soldiers defending themselves from an unruly mob (Two Accounts, 119). Preston began his account by explaining that the people of Boston were openly hostile to the presence of British troops and repeatedly endangered the safety of the soldiers. According to Preston, on the night of the 5th, about one hundred Bostonians gathered in King Street at the ringing of the fire bell. This crowd issued the most cruel and horrid threats, and particularly threatened the life of the sentry guarding the kings money (Two Accounts, 119). As the rioters pressed in on the sentry, Preston and twelve of his troops surrounded him, to offer him protection. Preston claimed that he deliberately did not order his troops to load their weapons, and he stood between the crowds and the soldiers endeavouring all in my power to persuade them to retire peaceably, but to no purpose. At this point, Preston claims that the hostile crowd attacked the British troops with clubs and snowballs, saying all our lives were in imminent danger. Preston suggested that the word fire was shouted by d eliberately provocative townspeople, adding to the confusion. Ultimately, he argued that the crowd backed the troops into a corner and then attacked them with clubs, forcing them to fire into the riotous mob in self defense. Despite this danger to the troops, Preston makes a point of saying that his orders were only dont fire, stop your firing (Two Accounts, 119). Preston sought to establish his innocence by contrasting his own honorable behavior with a portrayal of the Boston townspeople as both crude and dishonorable. He emphasized that the Americans used bad language, behaved as a bloodthirsty mob, and initiated the violence. He contrasted this outrageous behavior with his own self control, personal bravery, and humane efforts to restore peace (Two Accounts, 119). He portrayed himself as a victim of the violence, rather than the aggressor, by emphasizing that he was hit with a club by an anonymous member of the crowd so hard that it made it impossible to use his arm for some time. Overall, Prestons account rings with disdain for the Bostonians, and implies that the victims of the massacre were largely responsible for their own deaths. Prestons account contrasts sharply with the anonymous American account circulated by the Boston Town Meeting. The anonymous account was written as a form of anti-British propaganda soon after the event, and it was intended to expose and denounce the arrogance of occupying British troops. This document appears to be collaborative; it includes testimony from multiple eye witnesses to the events of March 5, 1770. The sources anonymity complicates its interpretation, especially where the author(s) wrote in passive voice and left it unclear who made claims such as, Captain Preston is said to have ordered them to fire . . . (Two Accounts, 122). Readers are left to wonder who said Captain Preston ordered them to fire. It appears that this document was hastily written by a committee, and consistency was lost in the rush to publicize the British crime. However, the tone of the document is consistent: the anonymous author(s) condemn the outrageous behavior of the British troops (Two Accounts, 121). The Bostonian account begins by recounting the names, social standing, and especially the cause of death of each victim of the massacre. By opening with this list, it humanizes and prioritizes the victims, something Prestons account definitely did not do. The account then summarizes its position, claiming that the actors in this dreadful tragedy were a party of soldiers commanded by Capt. Preston. The anonymous account offers very different background information on the events leading up to the tragedy from what Preston emphasized. Whereas Preston emphasized the incivility and hostility of the townspeople, the American account claimed that British troops had been deliberately provoking fights with Boston ropemakers and repeatedly losing. The anonymous account drew upon several Bostonians depositions to argue that the troops planned to commit some outrage upon the inhabitants of the town indiscriminately. The heavily armed troops marched through Boston, physically assaulting random ci tizens and taunting everyone with curses and insults. After a scuffle between the British sentry and some boys, Captain Preston and troops under his command pushed through the crowd with fixed bayonets, in so rough a manner that it appeared they intended to create a disturbance. According to the American account, the soldiers attacked members of the crowd while the townspeople had their backs turned, and there was not the least provocation given to Capt. Preston or his party. Finally, according to this account, the troops lined up in an organized semi-circle, and at the orders of Captain Preston, fired upon the crowd with deliberation. The American account sought to establish the honor and civility of the Bostonians in order to contrast the goodness of the American victims with the guilty, vicious soldiers. The account described the Bostonians in King Street the night of the tragedy as gentlemen and boys (Two Accounts, 121). The gentlemen behaved with civility, not offering provocation to the soldiers, and it was implied that the boys, while quarreling with the troops, did not pose a genuine threat to anyones safety. In contrast to the innocent Americans, the account depicted the British very critically. According to this document, the British soldiers were poor fighters, repeatedly finding themselves worsted in scuffles with Bostonian ropemakers. They were also bad losers, since they sought further mischief after these losing scuffles (Two Accounts, 120). The British soldiers were also indiscriminately violent, roaming through town with naked cutlasses, swords, c. all while assaulting and driving away the few they met there (Two Accounts, 121). Finally, while the gentlemen of Boston behaved with civility, the British troops used foul language, calling the Americans boogers and cowards (Two Accounts, 121). The American partisan account showed some areas of agreement with Captain Preston. Both accounts suggested that the dispute emerged out of the local ropewalk, and the working class rope makers played a prominent role in the crowd. Both accounts agreed that a scuffle emerged in front of the Custom House, involving the sentry. And both accounts agreed that this scuffle ended in bloodshed. However, Preston and the Americans disagreed completely when it came to assigning blame for this tragedy. Preston argued that the Americans initiated the violence, forcing the British to defend themselves. The Americans argued that the British initiated the violence, firing on innocent townspeople. Both sources suggest that the violence was premeditated, by individuals pushing to breach the relations between the American colonists and the mother country. While historians cannot necessarily tell which interpretation is most accurate, we can benefit from understanding the widening gap between the Americ ans and the British in 1770.